Peptide questions, checked carefully.Independent peptide information · Sources on every review · No sales · No dosing.

Independence · Current disclosure

The evidence is here for you, not for sale.

You should be able to trust that a rating is not a sales pitch. The Peptide Field does not sell peptides, send readers to sellers, accept paid rankings, or earn commissions from the molecules it reviews.

01

My current business position

This site has no peptide affiliate links, clinic referrals, sponsored product placements, paid evidence grades, vendor leaderboards, or buying tools. I keep those commercial routes out of the evidence process.

I do not accept payment from a manufacturer, compounder, clinic, laboratory, or seller to include, leave out, rank, or change a molecule.

No peptide seller, clinic, compounder, laboratory, or manufacturer funds or controls the current evidence record.

I have no relationship to report under the rules below. If that changes, I will disclose it here first.

02

Relationships I would tell you about

  • Funding, consulting, employment, equity, gifts, or research support connected to a covered molecule or product
  • Paid access, sponsorship, advertising, or data partnerships
  • A reviewer or contributor relationship that could reasonably influence judgment
  • Material use of private evidence that readers cannot inspect

03

Sponsors cannot control the reviews

If The Peptide Field introduces commercial support, it cannot choose claims, sources, conclusions, evidence labels, or update timing. Sponsored material must be clearly separate from the evidence record.

The Peptide Field will decline a future relationship that cannot meet this rule. Or it will pause the affected coverage and explain why.

04

Source conflicts also matter

Industry funding does not automatically make a study invalid. Independence does not automatically make a weak study strong. Sponsor role, study plan, comparison group, analysis, missing data, and repeated results all matter.

The Peptide Field keeps the source and its context. It does not replace a careful review with a simple good-or-bad label.