Current financial relationships
This site has no peptide affiliate links, clinic referrals, sponsored product placements, paid evidence grades, vendor leaderboards, or buying tools. I keep those commercial ties out of the review process.
I do not accept payment from a manufacturer, compounder, clinic, laboratory, or seller to include, leave out, rank, or change a molecule.
No peptide seller, clinic, compounder, laboratory, or manufacturer funds or controls the current evidence record.
I have no relationship to report under the rules below. If that changes, I will disclose it here first.
Conflicts I would disclose
- Funding, consulting, employment, equity, gifts, or research support connected to a covered molecule or product
- Paid access, sponsorship, advertising, or data partnerships
- A reviewer or contributor relationship that could affect a review
- Use of important evidence that readers cannot inspect
Outside funding cannot control reviews
If The Peptide Field introduces commercial support, it cannot choose claims, sources, conclusions, evidence labels, or update timing. Sponsored material must be clearly separate from the reviews.
I will reject a future relationship that cannot meet this rule. If needed, I will pause the affected coverage and explain why.
How I review research funding and other conflicts
Industry funding does not automatically make a study invalid. Independence does not automatically make a weak study strong. I check the sponsor's role, study plan, comparison group, analysis, missing data, and whether other studies found the same result.
I keep each source with its context. I do not replace a careful review with a simple good-or-bad label.