Independent information.Sources on every review · No sales

Editorial review

How the site is reviewed.

Each answer is checked against original studies and official records.

Read the review policy

What the editor checks

The site editor selects sources, writes claim wording, and decides corrections. There is no second reviewer in the current process.

The editorial standard (version 1.2) explains the source checks and evidence labels. The review policy (version 1.2) explains when pages are checked again.

No peptide seller, clinic, compounder, laboratory, or manufacturer funds or controls the current evidence record.

This is not medical review

The site has not been independently medically reviewed. The editor is not a physician or pharmacist and is not presented as one.

This site does not diagnose, treat, prescribe, or replace care from a licensed clinician.

If qualified clinical review happens later, the site will identify the reviewer, credentials, reviewed content, date, and conflicts.

How to report a problem

Use the corrections page to report a problem with a claim, source, product, date, or link.

Point to the exact page and sentence. Include a supporting source. Important verified changes appear in the public corrections record.